Generative AI applied to business: Real-world cases by Galde

Generative AI applied to business: 3 real-world cases from Galde in production

Projects in production. Measurable results. Real clients.

Generative AI is creating real value in real companies. But there’s a significant gap between the enthusiasm generated by demos and the reality of what’s being done with measurable results in concrete organizations.

Much more information can be gleaned from the MIT study that found 95% of AI prototypes never reach production: https://mlq.ai/media/quarterly_decks/v0.1_State_of_AI_in_Business_2025_Report.pdf

The three cases we present below are not prototypes or lab pilots. They are projects we’ve implemented with our clients, in production, with verifiable metrics. In all of them, the same pattern emerges: the differentiating factor isn’t the AI ​​model itself, but rather the data preparation, the clarity of the problem, and the management of organizational change.

These real-world examples of generative AI applied to business demonstrate that successful projects share a common pattern: they start with a specific problem, prepare the data before automation, integrate the solution into workflows, and ensure the client maintains technical control. AI delivers value when it reduces friction, accelerates processes, improves governance, and enables the scaling of data products without creating black boxes.

Why is there a gap between generative AI demos and production projects?

The conversation about generative AI in companies usually begins with very attractive demos: assistants that answer questions, tools that summarize documents or agents capable of automating repetitive tasks.

But a demo does not represent the complexity of a real company.

More difficult questions arise in production: where does the data come from? Who validates the answers? How is the information updated? What happens if the model is wrong? What team maintains the solution? How is the system audited?

Therefore, many AI projects do not fail due to lack of technological capacity. They fail because there is no solid foundation of data governance, clear processes or internal ownership.

At Galde, the approach is based on a simple idea: generative AI applied to business only works when it is designed as part of a real transformation, not as a superficial layer on top of messy data.

Logo de Galde Case 1 · Digital Platforms / Employment

Generative AI for data governance at InfoJobs (Adevinta)

-80%

documentation
time

faster
onboarding

400+

documented
assets

€80K

projected annual
savings

The Problem

InfoJobs, Spain’s leading job portal (part of the Adevinta group), had grown exponentially. Its data infrastructure had scaled at the same rate, but governance, documentation, and standardized practices had lagged far behind.

The timing was particularly critical: InfoJobs was about to become an independent legal entity, which required translating Adevinta’s global governance framework to its own operational reality. Previous attempts to implement governance had met with limited acceptance due to organizational resistance; teams perceived it as bureaucracy, not as a value-adding structure.

The Differentiating Approach: Generative AI as an Adoption Lever

The differentiating factor wasn’t the technology itself, but the methodology. Instead of imposing a top-down technical framework, we used generative AI as a lever for adoption and knowledge transfer:

  • Automated Documentation: Workflows assisted by LLMs (Claude Code API, Gemini Pro) that analyzed Redshift and Databricks schemas, generated drafts that engineers refined, and validated consistency across assets.
  • Role-Based Educational Content: Customized onboarding materials for each technical profile, with interactive tutorials, FAQs, and guides tailored to each user type.
  • Stakeholder-Based Communication: Analysis of JIRA tickets and past communications to identify successful change patterns, generating customized strategies for each group.
  • Foundational Technical Stack: Formalized ADRs, Golden Path 2025-26, and dbt integration roadmap

Galde's solution: Generative AI to accelerate documentation, onboarding, and adoption

Galde used generative AI as a lever for knowledge adoption and transfer. The key was not to impose a technical framework from above, but to reduce friction within teams when working on knowledge tasks.

The work included:

Results

  • 80% reduction in documentation time: from 4 hours to less than 1 hour per pipeline.
  • 4x improvement in onboarding speed: from 8 weeks to 2 weeks to full productivity.
  • 400+ assets documented (previously less than 30% had adequate documentation).
  • 75% of the team confident in continuing the practices autonomously after the project.
  • €80,000 in projected annual savings through infrastructure optimization and improved observability.
  • The methodology was adopted as a prototype for replication in other entities within the Adevinta group.

“Exceptional in every aspect. The AI-accelerated data governance transformation is technically rigorous and culturally sensitive. The 4x improvement in onboarding and 60% adoption of the governance demonstrate a real transformation.”

— AI Transformation Award Jury Member · Malt, 3rd Place Finalist out of 161 projects

Key takeaway: Organizational resistance (not technology) is the primary reason governance initiatives fail. When AI is used to eliminate friction in knowledge work, without replacing human judgment, adoption accelerates dramatically.

Logo de Galde Case 2 · Reinsurance / Financial Services

Scalable credit-scoring product in less than 60 days (SCOR SE, APAC)

<60d

MVP in
production

APAC

multi-country
since day 1

0

black
boxes

100%

internal ownership for
SCOR

The Problem

SCOR SE, in the APAC (Asia Pacific) region, needed to launch a new credit-scoring product to support B2B partners in India and extend it to multiple countries in the APAC region. The challenges were simultaneous: speed of validation (weeks, not months), regulatory heterogeneity between countries, operational scalability of the product, and complete control of the model by the internal team, without vendor lock-in.

The Approach:  MVP60™ Framework

Galde applied its MVP60™ co-creation framework, designed for data products in regulated industries. The project was structured around three pillars:

  • Technical Clarity: Definition of scoring logic, pipeline architecture, data quality and ingestion rules, and comprehensive documentation with explainable traceability for future integrations with third-party Generative AI systems.
  • Business Viability: Validation of alternative pricing models, comparison with actuarial teams, and go-to-market strategy for India and the rest of APAC.
  • Governance and Replicability: Mapping of regulatory compliance by country, comprehensive documentation and auditability, and a replication template for new APAC markets.

The project was executed with SCOR, not for SCOR: internal teams participated in the development to ensure full visibility and ownership.

Delivered solution

  • A fully transparent credit-scoring model: explainable, auditable, and adaptable to the local regulatory contexts of each APAC country.
  • A modular pipeline for data ingestion and validation: designed to address the fragmentation of data sources and variability among partners in the region.
  • Interactive dashboards for decision-making: score distribution, risk insights, and go-to-market assessment.
  • APAC deployment blueprint: a reusable framework for implementing the product in new countries in days, not months.

Results

  • MVP validated in less than 60 days, a validation cycle that allowed the SCOR APAC innovation team to iterate quickly.
  • Architecture designed for multi-country expansion (India → Southeast Asia) without redesigning from scratch.
  • SCOR retained full ownership of the model, code, documentation, and governance. No vendor lock-in.
  • The prototype was incorporated into the SCOR P&C APAC regional product innovation roadmap.

“Thanks to Galde, we launched a credit-scoring prototype in record time. It allows us to start operations in India and scale it easily and autonomously across APAC.”

— Adeline Chua, Head of Product & Innovation, APAC (SCOR)

Key takeaway: Speed ​​wasn’t achieved by cutting corners on governance, but by building it into the process from day one. A transparent and auditable model is faster to validate with regulators and easier to scale across countries.

Logo de Galde Case 3 · Reinsurance / Sustainability

World's first ecological restoration insurance (SCOR SE & AXA - NatReCo / SPOT)

1st

of its kind
in the world

Lloyd's

consortium with
AXA (2026)

multi

biomes and
geographies

SER

international
ecological standard

The Problem

SCOR SE set out to build a first-generation insurance product to capture the risks of ecological restoration projects, a market that had never been insured in this way. The challenges were exceptionally complex: no existing price benchmarks, apart from a few pilot programs by other large reinsurers; processes that develop over decades; and the need to simultaneously align actuaries, legal teams, environmental experts, and global innovation teams.

The product had to be, from the outset, a scalable platform, not a one-off, capable of evolving across different project types, geographies, and risk profiles.

The Approach

Galde joined SCOR SE’s Product & Innovation team to co-develop the technical and commercial foundations of the NatReCo solution. The work was structured around three pillars:

  • Technical Clarity: Definition and structuring of pricing models for ecosystem insurance, implementation of the rater component in SPOT (SCOR’s online pricing tool), and documentation and validation of models with the actuarial and data teams.
  • Multi-functional Product Design: Coordination between actuaries, legal teams, and the global innovation team. Alignment of technical feasibility, regulatory requirements, and commercial viability.
  • Governance and Scalability: A modular product framework adaptable to different biomes, risk profiles, and geographies, with internal teams retaining full ownership of models and documentation.

Delivered Solution

  • Restore Product: Coverage for the implementation phase of ecological restoration projects, managing the unpredictable climate risks that can compromise ecosystem recovery.
  • Manage Product: Coverage for the ongoing management phase, focused on maintaining and improving established recovery conditions.
  • Scalable Pricing Infrastructure (SPOT): A rater component, documented models, dashboard, and reporting tools that allow underwriting projects in terrestrial biomes with configurable profile sets.
  • Standards-Based Due Diligence Framework: A rating system developed in collaboration with the Society for Ecological Restoration (SER) to ensure that only high-integrity projects are insured.

Results

  • SCOR became the world’s first reinsurer to offer insurance dedicated to ecological restoration projects, creating a new product category.
  • This work escalated into a formal Lloyd’s of London consortium (January 2026) led by SCOR Syndicate 2015 and supported by AXA XL Syndicate 2003.
  • Global reach: The consortium combines global capacity and distribution, extending NatReCo products into new geographies and more complex markets.
  • NatReCo is now a consolidated innovation platform within SCOR P&C Underwriting Solutions, with a roadmap that includes a third product (Conserve) currently under development.

Galde consistently brought strategic judgment and cross-functional collaboration to complex discussions involving pricing models, multi-stakeholder data gathering, and product design. Their contributions were fundamental in aligning technical feasibility, regulatory requirements, and commercial viability within a highly innovative and nascent product area. The impact of Galde’s work has been tangible: these initiatives have grown into industry collaborations, including the launch of a Lloyd’s of London consortium with AXA.”

Henri Douche, Head of Product & Innovation (SCOR SE)

Key takeaway: The unprecedented complexity of the domain, lacking price benchmarks and involving multiple simultaneous stakeholders, could only be addressed with a methodology that prioritized technical clarity, regulatory feasibility, and governance from day one. The product wasn’t built for SCOR; it was built with SCOR.

Common patterns in successful projects

Analyzing these three cases, consistent patterns emerge that distinguish them from projects that don’t reach production or are abandoned early on:

  • The quality of input data is the most frequent limiting factor: In all three cases, there was a prior or parallel data preparation phase to ensure that both the Generative AI models and the associated agents, present and future, function reliably. Skipping this phase produces lower-quality results and hinders adoption.
  • Adoption requires trust, and trust requires verifiability and good evaluation processes: Systems that allow users to understand the origin of a response or decision have significantly higher adoption rates.
  • Workflow changes matter as much as technology: The most successful projects didn’t just deploy technology; they redefined how the team works. This requires change management, training, and adaptation time. Furthermore, thanks to this change management process, the guardrails and control and audit points could be properly established for each scenario.
  • Start with limited cases and scale: All three projects began with a very defined scope (for example, in the case of Smart Credit, one market (India), one product, one pilot team) and built the scaling formula from the validated foundation.
  • Maintenance is the real challenge: Launching the system is the easy part. Maintaining it (updating the knowledge base, monitoring quality, adapting it when the business or market changes) is where the value is determined.
  • Internal ownership from day one: In all three cases, internal teams participated in the development. No one received a black box. Post-project autonomy is a key performance indicator (KPI) of the project itself.

Conclusion

Generative AI is creating real value in real companies. Not in every company or every project, but certainly in those that have identified a specific problem, properly prepared the underlying data, and managed the implementation with the same seriousness as any other transformation project.

The InfoJobs, SCOR APAC, and SCOR SE + AXA cases don’t share technology, sector, or geography. They do share a methodology: clarity about the problem, data preparation as a prerequisite, not a consequence, and a genuine transfer of capabilities to internal teams.

The enthusiasm of demos must be contrasted with the discipline of production. And the discipline of production almost always begins with the data.

How Galde helps turn generative AI into real business value

Galde works with companies that need to move from idea to execution, building data and AI solutions that can operate in real-world contexts.

Through its generative AI service, Galde helps identify viable use cases, design secure solutions, and build production-ready systems.

Through data governance, it supports organizations in defining ownership, documentation, traceability, and quality processes.

And through data platforms, it builds the necessary technical foundation to scale data products, advanced analytics, and AI.

You can see more projects in Galde’s success stories section or explore other content in Thought Leadership.

Frequently asked questions about generative AI applied to business

What does generative AI applied to business mean?

Generative AI applied to business involves using models capable of generating responses, documentation, analysis, or automation within real business processes. Its goal is not to create a demo, but to improve processes, reduce friction, and generate measurable results.

Why do many generative AI projects fail to reach production?

Many generative AI projects fail to reach production because they are developed without prepared data, governance, clear metrics, or internal ownership. The technology may work in a test, but fail when integrated into real-world processes.

What role does data governance play in generative AI?

Data governance enables AI to work with reliable, documented, traceable, and up-to-date information. Without governance, models can generate seemingly coherent responses based on incorrect or disorganized data.

What real-world examples exist of generative AI in companies?

Some real-world examples include the use of generative AI for data governance at InfoJobs, the development of a scalable credit-scoring product for SCOR APAC, and the creation of insurance products for ecological restoration with SCOR SE and AXA.

What does a company need before implementing generative AI?

Before applying generative AI, a company needs to define a specific use case, prepare its data, establish responsibilities, design a secure architecture, measure the impact, and ensure that the internal team can maintain the solution.