Galde

Palantir implementation audit

Already running Palantir and it is not delivering what you expected? We analyse the architecture, pipelines, dataset organisation, Ontology, permissions and maintainability of your current implementation, and tell you what to change first.

When an audit makes sense

When compute costs grow without explanation, when every change depends on one person or one provider, when the Ontology no longer reflects the business or when use cases stay stuck in pilot. It does not matter who carried out the implementation.

What we do

Architecture and costs

How projects and environments are organised, and where the compute goes.

Pipelines and datasets

Quality, tests, documentation and duplication.

Ontology

Whether the model reflects the business and supports the next use cases.

Permissions and governance

Who can see and change what, and whether it can be proven.

Maintainability and dependency

What your team can maintain on its own and what an exit would involve.

With MVP60™

The first use case reaches production in 60 days, and every technical decision is documented so your team can maintain it.

Frequently asked questions

Can you review an implementation carried out by another partner?

Yes. The review does not depend on who carried out the implementation.

What exactly is reviewed?

The architecture, pipelines, dataset organisation, Ontology, permissions and maintainability of the current implementation.

And after the review?

We can carry out the improvements with your team or hand over the prioritised plan for whoever you choose to execute it.

All our Palantir lines of work

Our articles on Palantir

What we learn in every implementation, explained for the people who have to decide.